We have detected that cookies are not enabled on your browser. Please enable cookies to ensure the proper experience.
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009

    Anyone else wish the Books were forced to be linear, one chapter at a time?

    I remember, as a new user, the Epic quests were a disjointed mess-simply because I could pick up various quests from individual books simultaneously, and I had no idea to try to avoid doing that--a quest was a quest, so I picked it up--and lost the continuity of the story. The Epics, indeed, felt pretty much like any quests to my newbie mind.

    I see a LOT of new users doing the same thing, and sometimes accidentally do it myself. Pick 'em up when they find 'em, do 'em all out of order, never really getting the full story properly.

    Why not just force them to be done one at a time--start at Vol X, book 1, chapter 1--and NO other quests in that volume become available until you do the chapters in order. Book 2 opens only when book 1 is done. Etc. I don't have a problem with having the different VOLUMES do-able simultaneously, but only one chapter at a time in each, as a prerequisite to the next.

    Seems to me it would make the Epic story lines much more likely to be followed as intended, and prevent people from having 4 or 5 (or more) open quests from the same Volume in their quest tracker, essentially obliterating the narrative.
    I7-6700k, Gigabyte Gaming 5 motherboard, MSI GamingX GTX 1070, Samsung 850 EVO SSD (500 GB), 3200 DD4 16 GB Ram, 1920x1200 28 inch monitor, Win 10

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Well that's what I wish, sometimes people forget about Volume 1 after they get their first LI in Volume 2. I experience it as it was intended.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    I think it is primarily because certain elements of certain epics are required in order to do non-epic things, such as accessing Eastern Angmar, and not everyone bothers with epics.
    R5 105 GRD Marevayave - Leader of Riddermarked For Death
    R8 105 MNS Fayah/100 LM Siennah/105 HNT Dinenol/100 RK Dhurik
    100 CHN Alachas/85 CPT Dinfaerien/60 BUR Dhax/62 WDN Godoric
    R9 105 MNS Fayeh (alt Wilya) - Lonely Mountain Band @ Landroval

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Middle Earth, Arda

    Thumbs down

    No, it is personal preferences & some events in the epic happen simultaneusly. I like to have from time to time the flexibility to choose to see 1st of a series of events that happened at sametime on different places. On the books big things where happening at Minas Morgul, Inside Minas Tirith, & outside the fence. If the epics were always, linear great pieces of the epic will be lost.

    ~ Check my Kinship at Gladden server: The Fate of Middle Earth ~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    A little more gating might be good, but not nearly as strict as you propose. Many books aren't really connected other than by the quest giver for the vector quest, there is no reason to add a dependency there (e.g. book 3 -> book 4, or book 5 -> book 6). Also this would kinda force people to use the same levelling path all the time, and probably upset some players that don't own all related quest packs (e.g. "why do I have to run around in the Trollshaws for days just to do the Epic books in Angmar").
    Too much gating like in Rohan is just extremely annoying for no benefit.
    Used to play: 85 Champ / Captain / Runekeeper / Guardian, Guild Master of everything but cooking.
    Playing now: Hellcat / King Tiger / GW Panther / IS / KV-5 / M4 Sherman and more

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Middle Earth
    Actually I would wish for the opposite. I've done the Moria and Mirkwood skirms and the loathsome "We cannot get out" session play more times than I care to remember. What I would like is to be able to skip those bits of the epic since I've seen them soooooo many times now and there's no way to finish the epic in that area without doing them. I currently have three characters is various stages of Mirkwood and four in Moria (and five at cap.) If I could take the skirms and session play as read, since they're all unlocked on my account, I would be thrilled.

  7. #7
    The Epic Line has multiple start points for several reasons:

    1) The story is not connected. You complete one story - a chain. You can decide which story you want to do next.

    2) The Epic gates content access. If would have been a mess on Moria launch day if the Epic was chained together. You had to do Volume 2, Book 1 to get into Moria. People would not have been happy to go back and do all 15 books in Volume 1.

    Moria also brought Volume 1, Book 15. The final instance 1.15.12 was very difficult. Most people I knew went back with a full group of six at level cap (way over level) - level 60. You get wiped. At that time, I felt that this Epic Instance was the most difficult group instance at the challenge level. It was very hard. You had a lot of people trying to do this instance that weren't trained groupers. Most people didn't want to go back and help someone once they had finished it for credit.

    Turbine ended up putting in helping barter coins for people that went a second+ time. Later on Turbine nerfed the instance by making in a solo instance. You could still take a group of six and steam roll it. A group of 3-4 works better with the scaled Inspired Greatness.

    3) Epic Content was gated by content access. No Moria expansion. No access to Volume 2. Mirkwood came out. Turbine created a new start point so that we did not have to buy Moria and do all of Moria. Again in the Moria Epic Line there were some group instances that people couldn't complete.

    Now we are returning to the "must own content" to access this chunk of the Epic Line. Chaining all of the Epic together is a good to frustrate players.
    Unless stated otherwise, all content in this post is My Personal Opinion.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.