As written here: http://lorebook.lotro.com/wiki/Legen...ence_Per_Level
Up to lvl 30 all agers require same XP to level up.
If most of the time I level up to 31, am I right assuming that the extra iXP I have to grind is the:
3rd age is 20,000 per level
2nd age is 40,000 per level -> 20K more to reach 31 with SA compared to 3rd:
1st age is 80,000 per level -> 40K more to reach 31 with SA compared to 2nd and 60K to 3rd:
Deconning at 31 to extract legacy is my target. I know all the pros/cons even duscussing LIs before level cap, however ...
Am I right to assume that it is not that "scary" to level up 2nd or 1st ager to 31 then (iXP wise).
Question 2: Are there any advantages in this case for having 2nd or 1st agers (except some more DPS)?
Example: do they get more points per level (up to 30) or nothing except the DPS is different between agers up to 30?
I am a slow leveller, don't mind doing grey quests as well as jump forth and back quickly bursing 5 levels then slowdown.
Therefore sometimes I just learn new skills, then slowdown to enjoy, sometimes just grind XP/iXP to move forward.
My point is: before level CAP, which changes quicker than I'm leveling, nowadays - is there a difference choosing
1st ager vs 2nd or 3rd, if I intend to decon at 31?
Hunter's main-hand buffstick - is a 60SA bearable DPS up to 68? or shall I craft a 65SA and keep it to 71?
All in all I know at 71 it will be better to switch to 3rd ager for the DPS and some new relic level requirement.
Again - sometimes I like to stay in the 60ies and slow level - therefore asking for the better buff-stick approach,
as it may be a hassle to make one with all the LIs I'm used to have (movement speed, % heal, % parry, % crit).
For the bow - I guess the 3rd ager is a must as even leveling in 5 lvl jumps the DPS difference will be noticeable.
Is this the preferred option or should I stick to 2nd agers instead?
Thank you in advance,