About the only thing I can say regarding the Trait Trees is that those who are opposed to the very idea should understand that the change to Trait Trees is coming with Update 12, full stop. There are some who don't want to hear that. We know this. You've probably heard from some of them as they've violated their NDA and their commitments as beta players. But those who have taken the fact that trait tress are coming and their role to make them the best they can be seriously, have thus far provided invaluable feedback and led to direct changes to specific trees, skill access, and more and continue to do so.
There is no "draft" to share as the trees change based on feedback nearly every build (some more than others). In fact we put up a new beta build today that made some changes and we'll soon be putting up another that changes them even more based on beta tester feedback.
[b][SIZE=3][COLOR="#FFFFFF"]Cainwen Ciaphas[/COLOR][/SIZE][/b][COLOR="#C3C3C3"], Captain of Crickhollow, [url=http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/CiaphasCain]HERO OF MIDDLE EARTH[/url]!!!
[i]I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered![/i] My opinions are my own![/color]
Sapience you should really link the new dev diary here.
Basically the skills are streamlined and made more useful all-round.
The only thing I am worried about so far with the trait trees is "cookie cutter builds". With the existing system I really enjoy being able to customise my class; pick and choose what traits I want to have, and not have to pick X trait to get Y trait and then finally the Z trait that I actually want. I'm hoping it won't be a case of:
Burglar A: "I'm red traited with A and B traits in green"
Burglar B: "Yeah me too!"
Burglar C: "I'm green traited with A and B traits in red"
Burglar D: "Wow small world - me too!"
I hope I'm completely wrong though! - I hope there's enough customisability left and enough "pick and choose" to keep things interesting and varied without carbon copy classes running around everywhere.
My statement was based on reading many complaints stemming from previous betas once they go open or the release goes live that large numbers of fairly severe bugs/balance issues/exploits/etc were reported in beta and not fixed. And my understanding (being in software development) that big changes rarely are going to come towards the end of a development cycle, and the beta is relatively speaking the end. Tuning yes, small changes, sure. Glad to hear beta feedback is being taken seriously and making it into the product.
No cookie cutter, hybrid builds will be efficient at a cost, that cost is if you go full into a line you will get more powerful benefits.
But don't get me wrong there will always be a way, better more efficient of traiting but even that way, with time players will decide which builds are better for something and those that aren't as good, thats how it works.
Being in software development you're probably well aware that in the feedback loop you have a group that always seems to interpret "listen to feedback" as "listen to my personal feedback and not feedback I disagree with." It was true when I worked for a company that made major desk top publishing products, it's true now.
I'm not saying the trees are going to be better, as I have reservations as well about changes to the toon I started with. But I just don't see it as making cookie cutter characters any more prevalent then they are today.
Aye thanks Al and Yulin for the info - and you're right... I'm likely worrying over nothing - I went ahead and pre-ordered anyway, and I'm a lifer - albeit I don't get much time to play anymore, what with work and everything.
Curious about legendary items though.. just got a nice second ager on my mid-level 63 burg with 6 major / 1 minor legacies (the exact ones I wanted) on it - have it fully upgraded and with the galadhrim scroll (beleriand + orc damage)... so yep, put a bit of time into it to take me as high as possible before I change. Obviously the huge skill revamp will mean legendary items will change too - but how?... will we get to pick the same tier legacies again for the new traits/skills? Bit confused as to what will happen, because this is such a massive overhaul. Sorry probably off topic... yet related.
looking forward to the HD release and Trait tree dropping, as i've said before on kin chat with my kin mates,i am tired of the old system,it ruins the flow when i have to head to town every 2 levels to get new skills, i will enjoy the trait tree so much more and it will give me something to do with characters,taking my time specing them the way i want to play them,i dont really understand the hate sometimes LOTRO gets, its like gamers today are never satsfied its always the same thing "give us changes in the game,its always the same thing" "why are you changing the game,leave it how it is"
i've been playing since the game went f2p,about a month after that i signed up and have been VIP ever since, im not saying people who pay for the game dont have the right to complain but at least wait til HD releases and give it a shot,
"Live and Let Die"
Ok, fair enough.
Well they have already falsely advertised the trait "trees" because they look more like a diagram or flow chart rather than a pine, oak, or maple tree...
When you have something worth promoting, you promote it.
When you're selling snake-oil, you hear a lot about it, but never get to see how it performs until you buy it.
If it's that unfinished a month from launch, I hope you enjoy popcorn whilst watching train wrecks...
But assuming the re-vamps are wonderful and all - what purpose does it serve in a game where the multiplayer component is continually diminished?
What is the good of a more effective "role" when there is barely a smidge of content on the horizon that requires more than pasting things in the face?
Last edited by Southpa; Oct 10 2013 at 11:44 PM.
[SIZE=1][COLOR=White]The [/COLOR][/SIZE][URL="http://thenoldor.guildlaunch.com"][SIZE=3][B]NOLDOR[/B][/SIZE][/URL][SIZE=1][COLOR=White] of Arkenstone[/COLOR][/SIZE]
Battles are group content and HD is launching with group content that players from almost any level can engage in together. That sounds like a big focus on group content to me.
Meaning that they do not shown it because they want to hide it, only because they cannot have it ready before. Probably they lift NDA when game is more or less fixed. At that moment all possible "dev diaries" need to be re writen, checked and aproved and they are so late that we already have all information.
By the way, we will probably have NDA lifted soon (is it normally 1 month before release?) so we will only have to wait 1 or 2 weeks to be flooded by images of the trees and explanations from fellow players.
There are 3 new Epic Battles balanced for groups of various sizes. Seems like people could use their group roles in those. My worry is that if they emphasize "role" too strongly, it will make solo gameplay inflexible and boring. (Yes, I'm sure you think it's boring already, but many of us enjoy it).What is the good of a more effective "role" when there is barely a smidge of content on the horizon...
Maley Oakensage, Captain of Landroval
Alas Elendilmir, may you *jingle jangle* forever in the Forgotten West
I would expect alot of people feel this way, I know I do especially the part about the snake oil. They keep being burnt by not saying what they mean and at that point it is false advertising but they are a gaming company and somehow that makes it alright? When beta goes live we will see what the masses say compared to the hand picked few. That will be the true test of how well they did and of course the few weeks after if all the raiders go away again. We will see!
Mean what you say and say what you mean! If you don't there are always consequences!
This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.Reload